Home | Contact Us | PIP Careers  

Results - Design NPV optimisation – major coal mine/rail/port project

Context / scope of project: A new mining company wanted to build mine, port and rail assets to develop extensive coal resources. The recent feasibility study output came in at $13.8 billion which is more than what they were hoping for. PIP was asked to assist their team to identify significant NPV improvements by focusing on direct capital cost ($9.8 billion) – targeting a range of $1-1.5 billion in capex savings.

Client achieved:
 

Capital focused improvements: 

Identified more than 200 capex reduction ideas with the potential to reduce the capex by $3.6 billion and increase the NPV by $5.2 billion

$1.2 billion of capex reductions able to be incorporated in the design within 6 weeks and another $1.6 billion of further capex reductions able to be incorporated in the design in the next 6 months

$0.9 billion of very hard ideas that require more than 6 months of study

 

Non-capital focused improvements:

Identified more than 30 NPV improvement ideas from levers other than capital reduction

$1.2 billion in NPV improvement without any additional capex and further $1.1 billion in incremental NPV with ~$100 million in additional capex. These ideas could be analysed and approved within 6 weeks. Further $2.3 billion in potential NPV with ~$700m in additional capex which could be analysed and approved within 6 months

Another $0.6 billion of NPV improvement to be worked on post 6 months 


 

Back to top  |  Back to 'Our Results' page     


Back to 'Our Clients' Results'
  

What we did:

Phrase 1

Conducted more than 5 workshops, 7 deep dives and 15 one-on-one meetings to identify potential alternative design options 

Documented, prioritised and valued all the generated ideas 

Worked with client engineers on the analysis of quick win ideas 

Conducted the first decision group meeting, which accepted 163 million capex reduction ideas (quick wins)
Phrase 2
This work is just commencing


 
  ©Copyright Partners in Performance 2004 | Disclaimer